Hidayat Mahammad Husain Patankar etc. 2 vs Abdul Hamid Ibrahim Modak etc. 5 Advocate - Mangle Chandrakant Mukund — 36/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,Order-41. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 28th April 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHRT010004182018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
304/2018
Filing Date
19-04-2018
Registration No
36/2018
Registration Date
20-04-2018
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hidayat Mahammad Husain Patankar etc. 2
Adv. Gawankar Gajanan Narayan
Farzana Hidayat Patankar
Adv. Gawankar Gajanan Narayan
Respondent(s)
Abdul Hamid Ibrahim Modak etc. 5 Advocate - Mangle Chandrakant Mukund
Jasim Hammid Modak
Adv. Mangle Chandrakant Mukund
Asim Hammid Modak
Adv. Mangle Chandrakant Mukund
Ajara Aslam Patankar
Adv. Mangle Chandrakant Mukund,Mangle Chandrakant Mukund
Almas Shoheb Wagale
Adv. Mangle Chandrakant Mukund,Mangle Chandrakant Mukund
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff is entitled to a ½ share in the suit properties. The court found that Kaka Patankar validly gifted his share to his two daughters-in-law (Ayesha and Ashu) in 1960, and the plaintiff subsequently acquired Ayesha's entire share through a 1997 gift deed and 2000 will deed. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that these documents violated the Consolidation and Fragmentation Act and upheld the plaintiff's right to partition her share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the defendants' appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff is entitled to a ½ share in the suit properties. The court found that Kaka Patankar validly gifted his share to his two daughters-in-law (Ayesha and Ashu) in 1960, and the plaintiff subsequently acquired Ayesha's entire share through a 1997 gift deed and 2000 will deed. The court rejected the defendants' contentions that these documents violated the Consolidation and Fragmentation Act and upheld the plaintiff's right to partition her share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts