State of Maharashtra vs Pravin Prakash Parab etc. 4 Advocate - Waykool Ajit Madhukar Chief LADC — 7/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),22(a),29,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010002932023
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
79/2023
Filing Date
17-04-2023
Registration No
7/2023
Registration Date
18-04-2023
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Salvi Prafulla Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
Pravin Prakash Parab etc. 4 Advocate - Waykool Ajit Madhukar Chief LADC
Onkar Jagdish Borkar
Adv. Bhatkar Sandesh Maruti
Abdul Matin Hasanmiya Dongarkar
Adv. Bhatkar Sarojini Chandrakant
Prerana Anthoni Sathe Ashirfa
Adv. Bhatkar Sarojini Chandrakant
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 05-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 09-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for interim custody of two mobile handsets (Vivo Y22 and Goving Gold) seized in NDPS Special Case No. 7/2023 is allowed. The court ordered the handsets be returned to accused Abdul Matin Hasanmiya Dongarkar upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000, with conditions that he shall not use them for any crime, produce them in court when required, and not alienate them until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for interim custody of two mobile handsets (Vivo Y22 and Goving Gold) seized in NDPS Special Case No. 7/2023 is allowed. The court ordered the handsets be returned to accused Abdul Matin Hasanmiya Dongarkar upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000, with conditions that he shall not use them for any crime, produce them in court when required, and not alienate them until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts