Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi vs Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo — 23/2024

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT010002602024

e-Filing Number

26-03-2024

Filing Number

198/2024

Filing Date

27-Mar-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

01-Apr-2024

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi

    Adv. Parkar Sachin Ramesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  9. 29-Sep-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Session Judge Ratnagiri.

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  14. 09-May-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  15. 08-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  16. 25-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  18. 07-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  19. 21-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  20. 20-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  21. 21-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  22. 26-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  23. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  24. 24-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  25. 03-May-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  26. 05-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  27. 01-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 27-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case