Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi vs Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo — 23/2024

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT010002602024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-03-2024

Filing Number

198/2024

Filing Date

27-03-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

01-04-2024

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi

Adv. Parkar Sachin Ramesh

Respondent(s)

Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

23-01-2026

Hearing

19-12-2025

Dismissal Order

27-11-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case