Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi vs Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo — 23/2024
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT010002602024
e-Filing Number
26-03-2024
Filing Number
198/2024
Filing Date
27-03-2024
Registration No
23/2024
Registration Date
01-04-2024
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandeep Nivrutti Suryawanshi
Adv. Parkar Sachin Ramesh
Respondent(s)
Mohini Sandeep Suryawanshi Advocate - Shetye Avinash Namdeo
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 19-12-2025 | Dismissal Order | |
| 27-11-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri allowed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 26-day delay in filing an appeal against a marriage dissolution order dated 12.10.2023. The court found the delay was not inordinate, deliberate, or intentional, as the applicant (a PSI in the police department) faced genuine difficulties attending court dates due to official duties and multiple legal complaints filed by the respondent. The court directed the office to register the appeal, granting the applicant an opportunity to challenge the lower court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts