State of Maharashtra vs Shiyad A. K. etc. 3 Advocate - Padvekar Shamim A. Sattar — 9/2022
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),21(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010002592022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2022
Filing Date
21-04-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
22-04-2022
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Phansekar Aniruddha Avinash
Respondent(s)
Shiyad A. K. etc. 3 Advocate - Padvekar Shamim A. Sattar
Najaf Moidu Naoufal
Adv. Nene Pradeep Pandharinath
Mohammad Abdul Jasim
Adv. Dingankar Mudassar Liyakat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The application filed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor to exhibit the inventory certificate prepared under Section 52A of the N.D.P.S. Act was allowed. The court rejected the defense's vague objections and held that the inventory certificate and photographs must be treated as primary evidence in the drug offense case. The certificate of inventory was accordingly marked as Exhibit 173. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The application filed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor to exhibit the inventory certificate prepared under Section 52A of the N.D.P.S. Act was allowed. The court rejected the defense's vague objections and held that the inventory certificate and photographs must be treated as primary evidence in the drug offense case. The certificate of inventory was accordingly marked as Exhibit 173. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts