Gangubai Laxman Kambale vs Prabhakar Babu Jadhav etc. 3 Advocate - Mandavkar Mahendra Vasant — 4/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43,R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHRT010001952023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/2023
Filing Date
06-03-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
08-03-2023
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangubai Laxman Kambale
Adv. Bhatawadekar Madhav Bhalchandra
Respondent(s)
Prabhakar Babu Jadhav etc. 3 Advocate - Mandavkar Mahendra Vasant
Babu Ganpat Jadhav
Adv. Bhatawadekar Madhav Bhalchandra
Shaila Sona Jadhav
Adv. Bhatawadekar Madhav Bhalchandra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction, restraining the defendant (respondent no. 1) from carrying out further construction on the disputed field until 14/03/2023. The Principal District Judge found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiffs, noting that the property shares had not been partitioned and the construction lacked proper sanction from authorities. The defendant was ordered to be served notice of this appeal by emergent process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted an ad-interim injunction, restraining the defendant (respondent no. 1) from carrying out further construction on the disputed field until 14/03/2023. The Principal District Judge found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiffs, noting that the property shares had not been partitioned and the construction lacked proper sanction from authorities. The defendant was ordered to be served notice of this appeal by emergent process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts