Siddharth Vijay Shetye vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ratnagiri City Police Station etc.3 Advocate - Phansekar Aniruddha Avinash — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT010001392026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

371

Police Station

Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siddharth Vijay Shetye

    Adv. Pradeep Pandharinath Nene

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ratnagiri City Police Station etc.3 Advocate - Phansekar Aniruddha Avinash

  2. 2.Sharad Raghunath Jadhav

  3. 3.Satej Shantaram Ghawali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the application and directed the return of a seized Vivo Y72 mobile phone and SIM cards to applicant Satej Shantaram Ghawali, finding him to be the rightful owner, despite the investigation being pending under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The phone was ordered released upon execution of a ₹20,000 bond with conditions that the applicant must not dispose of or transfer the device without court permission and must produce it for investigative purposes as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and directed the return of a seized Vivo Y72 mobile phone and SIM cards to applicant Satej Shantaram Ghawali, finding him to be the rightful owner, despite the investigation being pending under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The phone was ordered released upon execution of a ₹20,000 bond with conditions that the applicant must not dispose of or transfer the device without court permission and must produce it for investigative purposes as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case