State of Maharashtra vs Savita Suresh Joshi etc. 3 Advocate - Tharwal Sachin Sudhir — 4/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,34,. Status: Documents. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010001392021
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2021
Filing Date
11-02-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
12-02-2021
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Jaigad Police Station.
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Prabhu Varsha Dattatray
Respondent(s)
Savita Suresh Joshi etc. 3 Advocate - Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Sunil Suresh Joshi
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Suresh Krushnaji Joshi
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Documents
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting R and P
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Documents | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting R and P |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application by accused Sunil Suresh Joshi seeking permission to obtain a passport and travel abroad during pendency of a POCSO case was partly allowed. The court permitted him to apply for a passport but imposed a condition requiring prior court permission before traveling abroad with a detailed schedule. The court clarified that its no-objection does not direct passport authorities to issue the passport, which shall be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application by accused Sunil Suresh Joshi seeking permission to obtain a passport and travel abroad during pendency of a POCSO case was partly allowed. The court permitted him to apply for a passport but imposed a condition requiring prior court permission before traveling abroad with a detailed schedule. The court clarified that its no-objection does not direct passport authorities to issue the passport, which shall be decided on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts