Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5 vs The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant — 12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHRT010001382026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5

    Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

  2. 2.Reshma Ramakant Salunkhe

    Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

  3. 3.Rupesh Ramakant Salunkhe

    Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

  4. 4.Hrudaynath Ramakant Salunkhe

    Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

  5. 5.Rahul Ramakant Salunkhe

    Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant

  2. 2.The Sarpanch, On Behalf of Gram Panchayat Korle

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case