Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5 vs The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant — 12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHRT010001382026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96,

Petitioner(s)

Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5

Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Reshma Ramakant Salunkhe

Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Rupesh Ramakant Salunkhe

Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Hrudaynath Ramakant Salunkhe

Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Rahul Ramakant Salunkhe

Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash

Respondent(s)

The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant

The Sarpanch, On Behalf of Gram Panchayat Korle

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.

16-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

24-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

10-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

07-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

06-03-2026

First Order

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case