Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5 vs The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant — 12/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHRT010001382026
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramakant Shankar Salunkhe etc.5
Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash
Reshma Ramakant Salunkhe
Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash
Rupesh Ramakant Salunkhe
Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash
Hrudaynath Ramakant Salunkhe
Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash
Rahul Ramakant Salunkhe
Adv. Surve Pravin Prakash
Respondent(s)
The Collector, On Behalf of the State of Maharashtra etc.2 Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant
The Sarpanch, On Behalf of Gram Panchayat Korle
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
First Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 06-03-2026 | First Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by the appellant to maintain status quo on the suit property was allowed. Respondent No. 2 is directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property (buildings) which is the subject matter of the appeal until the next hearing date. This interim order was passed to prevent irreparable loss to the appellant and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, as Respondent No. 2 was attempting to demolish the buildings on the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts