Anant Mahadev Gurav etc.3 vs Govind Mahadev Muge etc.6 Advocate - Kadam Abhijeet Ashok — 4/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHRT010001292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Anant Mahadev Gurav etc.3

Adv. Sakhalkar Vijay Manohar

Namdev Gangaram Gurav

Adv. Sakhalkar Vijay Manohar

Santosh Narayan Gurav

Adv. Sakhalkar Vijay Manohar

Respondent(s)

Govind Mahadev Muge etc.6 Advocate - Kadam Abhijeet Ashok

Sitaram Shankar Wadekar

Deu Ganpat Ghume

Krishna Mahadev Gurav

Vidyadhar Shashikant Karambelkar

State Of Maharashtra Through Collector

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri rejected a revision application by the Gurav families challenging the Executive Magistrate's order permitting both parties to celebrate the Shimgostav festival. The court held that while a dispute existed regarding temple key handover between the families, deciding substantive rights to perform rituals fell outside the magistrate's jurisdiction under Sections 163-164 of the BNSS, and the parties must pursue appropriate legal remedies separately for such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri rejected a revision application by the Gurav families challenging the Executive Magistrate's order permitting both parties to celebrate the Shimgostav festival. The court held that while a dispute existed regarding temple key handover between the families, deciding substantive rights to perform rituals fell outside the magistrate's jurisdiction under Sections 163-164 of the BNSS, and the parties must pursue appropriate legal remedies separately for such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case