Sonali Swapnil Desai Before Marriage Sonali Avinash Shirke etc.2 vs None — 4/2026

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd April 2026.

Spl. Marriage Petn. - Marriage Petition under Special Marriage Act

CNR: MHRT010000952026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

68/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Sonali Swapnil Desai Before Marriage Sonali Avinash Shirke etc.2

Adv. Mulye Prajakta Suresh

Swapnil Suryakant Desai

Adv. Mulye Prajakta Suresh

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

23-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri granted mutual consent divorce to Sonali and Swapnil Desai under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act 1954, dissolving their marriage solemnized on 09.07.2024. The court found the marital tie irretrievably broken due to fundamental differences in life perspectives and ideology, with the parties separated for over a year despite reconciliation attempts. The court waived the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, noting all disputes were genuinely settled including return of gifts, no alimony claims, no children involved, and mediation had failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Ratnagiri granted mutual consent divorce to Sonali and Swapnil Desai under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act 1954, dissolving their marriage solemnized on 09.07.2024. The court found the marital tie irretrievably broken due to fundamental differences in life perspectives and ideology, with the parties separated for over a year despite reconciliation attempts. The court waived the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, noting all disputes were genuinely settled including return of gifts, no alimony claims, no children involved, and mediation had failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case