State of Maharashtra vs Manish Chandrakant Sabale Advocate - Dongare Aniket Uday — 3/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010000942026
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
30/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
FIR Details
FIR Number
456
Police Station
Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Phansekar Aniruddha Avinash
Respondent(s)
Manish Chandrakant Sabale Advocate - Dongare Aniket Uday
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Fixing date of Hearing
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Special Court, Ratnagiri allowed the bail application of Manish Chandrakant Sable, accused of rape and POCSO Act violations involving a minor. The court granted bail on a personal recognizance bond of ₹50,000 with one or two sureties, finding that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and three months custody was sufficient. Bail was granted on conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court appearance, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The Special Court, Ratnagiri allowed the bail application of Manish Chandrakant Sable, accused of rape and POCSO Act violations involving a minor. The court granted bail on a personal recognizance bond of ₹50,000 with one or two sureties, finding that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and three months custody was sufficient. Bail was granted on conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court appearance, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts