Santosh Sharad Narkar vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ratnagiri City Police Station Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 09th April 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRT010000622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

23-01-2026

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Santosh Sharad Narkar

Adv. Nalavade Manish Chandrakant

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Ratnagiri City Police Station Advocate - Shetye Pushparaj Shashikant

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

09-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Order

04-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri rejected the anticipatory bail application of Santosh Sharad Narkar, a bank branch manager accused of creating 39-43 fake loan accounts totaling ₹1,98,69,673 and misappropriating funds from Rajapur Urban Co-Operative Bank. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the serious charges and determined that the applicant's custody was necessary for investigation, holding him not entitled to pre-arrest bail under BNS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri rejected the anticipatory bail application of Santosh Sharad Narkar, a bank branch manager accused of creating 39-43 fake loan accounts totaling ₹1,98,69,673 and misappropriating funds from Rajapur Urban Co-Operative Bank. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the serious charges and determined that the applicant's custody was necessary for investigation, holding him not entitled to pre-arrest bail under BNS 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case