Gajanan Shankar Tambutkar and ors vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 66/2020
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28 A (3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190010372023
Filing Number
66/2020
Filing Date
07-12-2020
Registration No
66/2020
Registration Date
08-12-2020
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajanan Shankar Tambutkar and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Dipak Shankar Tambutkar
Asmita Anil Kirdavkar
Isha @ Ratnaprabha Viswas Sutar
Usha Dhondu Nigadekar
Manish Ganesh Sutar
Shanta Suresh Walavankar
Ankush Raman Tamhankar
Respondent(s)
M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors
M/s Collector Alibag - Raigad
Exe. Engineer Hetawane Kalawa division
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: LAR No. 66/2020 Court Decision The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award amount to Rs. 700/- per sq. meter for agricultural land acquired at Karanjadi village. The court found the original compensation inadequate and not reflective of prevailing market value, while rejecting the applicants' claim for Rs. 1,000/- per sq. meter as excessive. Key Reasoning The court held that the Special Land Acquisition Officer erred by: (1) grouping lands based on outdated revenue assessment rather than actual market conditions; (2) relying solely on government "ready reckoner" rates; and (3) ignoring comparable sale transactions and the land's non-agricultural development potential near M.I.D.C. Mahad. The court applied a 65% deduction for development costs from comparable sales, arriving at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter as fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAR No. 66/2020 Court Decision The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award amount to Rs. 700/- per sq. meter for agricultural land acquired at Karanjadi village. The court found the original compensation inadequate and not reflective of prevailing market value, while rejecting the applicants' claim for Rs. 1,000/- per sq. meter as excessive. Key Reasoning The court held that the Special Land Acquisition Officer erred by: (1) grouping lands based on outdated revenue assessment rather than actual market conditions; (2) relying solely on government "ready reckoner" rates; and (3) ignoring comparable sale transactions and the land's non-agricultural development potential near M.I.D.C. Mahad. The court applied a 65% deduction for development costs from comparable sales, arriving at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter as fair market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts