Baraku Vishram Nate vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 61/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28(A)-3. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190010252023

Filing Number

61/2020

Filing Date

05-Dec-2020

Registration No

61/2020

Registration Date

07-Dec-2020

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28(A)-3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baraku Vishram Nate

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: In Land Acquisition Directive Application 61/2020, the court allowed the petition to substitute the deceased original petitioner's legal heirs (son and daughter) on record. The heirs were permitted to file a corrected copy of the plaint within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 10-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 02-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 24-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 13-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 06-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 19-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 24-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 27-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 07-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 09-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 23-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 14-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 05-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Land Acquisition Directive Application 61/2020, the court allowed the petition to substitute the deceased original petitioner's legal heirs (son and daughter) on record. The heirs were permitted to file a corrected copy of the plaint within the prescribed time limit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case