Shri. Ramesh Shankar Nate vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 50/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190009752023

Filing Number

50/2020

Filing Date

21-Aug-2020

Registration No

50/2020

Registration Date

07-Jan-2021

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Ramesh Shankar Nate

    Adv. Navale B. T.

  2. 2.Shri. Suresh Shankar Nate

  3. 3.Shri. Tukaram Dhondu Nate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad

  2. 2.May. Collector, Raigad

  3. 3.May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane Canal Irrigation

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 50/2020 Outcome: The petition to record the heirs of deceased Original Petitioner No. 3 on the case record was ALLOWED. The court permitted the legal heirs (Petitioners 1 and 2 as sons, Petitioner 3 as daughter, and Petitioner 4 as widow) to be impleaded as parties to continue the land acquisition case. The heirs are directed to file a corrected plaint within the stipulated time period. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 08-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 02-May-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 24-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 27-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 20-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 23-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 20-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 26-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 20-Jun-2024

    —

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 04-Apr-2024

    —

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 04-Jan-2024

    —

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 19-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 21-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 50/2020 Outcome: The petition to record the heirs of deceased Original Petitioner No. 3 on the case record was ALLOWED. The court permitted the legal heirs (Petitioners 1 and 2 as sons, Petitioner 3 as daughter, and Petitioner 4 as widow) to be impleaded as parties to continue the land acquisition case. The heirs are directed to file a corrected plaint within the stipulated time period. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case