Shri. Mahadev Pangu Sutar vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 48/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190009652023

Filing Number

48/2020

Filing Date

21-Aug-2020

Registration No

48/2020

Registration Date

19-Jan-2021

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Mahadev Pangu Sutar

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad

  2. 2.May. Collector, Raigad

  3. 3.May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane Canal Irrigation

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: L.A.R. No. 48/2020 The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the applicants' reference for enhanced land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. The court found the original award inadequate and granted compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of the claimed Rs.1,000/-, along with statutory solatium, additional component, and interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 17-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 08-May-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 10-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 10-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 22-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 16-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 24-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 22-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 27-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 07-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  33. 14-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  34. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 21-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2020

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: L.A.R. No. 48/2020 The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the applicants' reference for enhanced land compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. The court found the original award inadequate and granted compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of the claimed Rs.1,000/-, along with statutory solatium, additional component, and interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case