Babu Devaji Katkari @ Pawar (Dead) thro. Lrs. vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 10/2021
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190008952023
Filing Number
10/2021
Filing Date
18-Jan-2021
Registration No
10/2021
Registration Date
19-Jan-2021
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Babu Devaji Katkari @ Pawar (Dead) thro. Lrs.
-
2.Dattaram Babu Katkari @ Pawar and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: Babu Devaji Katkari v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. 10/2021) The Court found that land acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project in Mumurshi village was inadequately compensated and awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per sq. meter instead of the originally awarded amount. The court rejected the Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology based on revenue assessment grouping and lack of comparable sale transactions, finding the land had non-agricultural potential near industrial areas and tourism sites. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
11-Sep-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
08-May-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
10-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
10-Apr-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
22-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
13-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
16-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
22-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
27-Jun-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
18-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
07-Mar-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
14-Dec-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2021
Summary: Babu Devaji Katkari v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. 10/2021) The Court found that land acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project in Mumurshi village was inadequately compensated and awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per sq. meter instead of the originally awarded amount. The court rejected the Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology based on revenue assessment grouping and lack of comparable sale transactions, finding the land had non-agricultural potential near industrial areas and tourism sites. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts