Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs. vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 8/2021
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190008892023
Filing Number
8/2021
Filing Date
18-01-2021
Registration No
8/2021
Registration Date
19-01-2021
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs.
Ajay Sanjay Sutar @ Savilakar and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts