Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs. vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 8/2021

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190008892023

Case disposed

Filing Number

8/2021

Filing Date

18-01-2021

Registration No

8/2021

Registration Date

19-01-2021

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs.

Ajay Sanjay Sutar @ Savilakar and ors

Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

02-05-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case