Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs. vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 8/2021

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190008892023

Filing Number

8/2021

Filing Date

18-Jan-2021

Registration No

8/2021

Registration Date

19-Jan-2021

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Govind Sutar @ Savilkar (Dead) thro. Lrs.

  2. 2.Ajay Sanjay Sutar @ Savilakar and ors

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  4. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 19-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 24-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 10-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 10-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 22-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 16-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 24-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 22-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  33. 27-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  34. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  35. 07-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  36. 14-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  37. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 18-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Sanjay Govind Sutar v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. No.8/2021) Decision: The court partially allowed the reference and enhanced land compensation from the original award. The applicants, whose agricultural land (2,700 sq. meters) in village Karanjadi was acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, were granted enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per square meter (instead of the originally awarded lower rate), along with statutory solatium (30%), additional components (12%), and interest (9% first year, 15% thereafter). Key Reasoning: The court found the original valuation method—based on outdated land revenue assessment classifications—legally flawed and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. The award failed to consider nearby sale transactions, N.A. (non-agricultural) potential, and proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad and tourism sites. Applying development cost deductions to comparable sales transactions, the court determined fair market value at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter, citing parity with predecessor decisions for similarly situated lands acquired under the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case