Shri. Usman Ismail Patankar vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 114/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190008272023

Filing Number

114/2020

Filing Date

29-Sep-2020

Registration No

114/2020

Registration Date

02-Feb-2021

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Usman Ismail Patankar

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad

  2. 2.May. Collector, Raigad

  3. 3.May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane Canal Irrigation

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 114/2020 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside the "without caveat" order dated 21.07.2022 issued against respondents 1 and 2, and granted permission for the case to proceed with caveat. Key Points: Petitioner Usman Ismail Patankar sought to quash the without-caveat order and requested caveat permission, citing that respondents' failure to file the caveat within the prescribed time was due to delays in obtaining necessary documents and government counsel discussions. The court found the petitioner's request justified and granted relief, noting that respondents would suffer no prejudice from allowing the caveat, while both parties would benefit from a full hearing on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 30-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 16-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 14-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 17-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 30-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 16-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 10-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 22-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 16-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 24-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 29-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 27-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  33. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  34. 14-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  35. 14-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  36. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 29-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 114/2020 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside the "without caveat" order dated 21.07.2022 issued against respondents 1 and 2, and granted permission for the case to proceed with caveat. Key Points: Petitioner Usman Ismail Patankar sought to quash the without-caveat order and requested caveat permission, citing that respondents' failure to file the caveat within the prescribed time was due to delays in obtaining necessary documents and government counsel discussions. The court found the petitioner's request justified and granted relief, noting that respondents would suffer no prejudice from allowing the caveat, while both parties would benefit from a full hearing on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case