Husen Usman Bavadekar and ors vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 103/2020
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190008052023
Filing Number
103/2020
Filing Date
10-Dec-2020
Registration No
103/2020
Registration Date
10-Dec-2020
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Husen Usman Bavadekar and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 103/2020 Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the reference for enhanced compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Key Findings: The court determined that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for 1,900 sq.meters of land in Bhomjai village (acquired for Nageshwari Dam) was inadequate. The original award was based on flawed methodology—classifying land by revenue assessment and relying solely on a Government Ready Reckoner without considering comparable market sales. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer failed to account for the land's non-agricultural potential, proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, Karanjadi Railway Station, and availability of civic amenities. After applying a 65% deduction for development costs to comparable sale transactions, the court fixed the enhanced compensation rate at Rs. 700/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9%-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
26-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
03-Jul-2025
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Jun-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
03-Apr-2025
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
20-Mar-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
16-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Oct-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
29-Aug-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
13-Jun-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
14-Mar-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
14-Dec-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2020
Case Summary: 103/2020 Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mahad partly allowed the reference for enhanced compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Key Findings: The court determined that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for 1,900 sq.meters of land in Bhomjai village (acquired for Nageshwari Dam) was inadequate. The original award was based on flawed methodology—classifying land by revenue assessment and relying solely on a Government Ready Reckoner without considering comparable market sales. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer failed to account for the land's non-agricultural potential, proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, Karanjadi Railway Station, and availability of civic amenities. After applying a 65% deduction for development costs to comparable sale transactions, the court fixed the enhanced compensation rate at Rs. 700/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9%-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts