Kashinath Ganpat Bhojane and ors vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 99/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007932023

Filing Number

99/2020

Filing Date

10-Dec-2020

Registration No

99/2020

Registration Date

10-Dec-2020

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kashinath Ganpat Bhojane and ors

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Kashinath Ganpat Bhojane v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (LAR 99/2020) The Civil Judge partly allowed the land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation for agricultural land in village Bhomjai from the original award to Rs.700/- per sq. meter. The court found the original award inadequate because the Special Land Acquisition Officer failed to consider nearby sale transactions, M.I.D.C. Mahad proximity, and non-agricultural development potential despite location advantages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 19-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 17-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 12-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 03-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 02-May-2024

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 21-Dec-2023

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 10-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kashinath Ganpat Bhojane v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (LAR 99/2020) The Civil Judge partly allowed the land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation for agricultural land in village Bhomjai from the original award to Rs.700/- per sq. meter. The court found the original award inadequate because the Special Land Acquisition Officer failed to consider nearby sale transactions, M.I.D.C. Mahad proximity, and non-agricultural development potential despite location advantages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case