Vasant Sakharam Dasgaonkar vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 98/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007892023

Case disposed

Filing Number

98/2020

Filing Date

10-12-2020

Registration No

98/2020

Registration Date

10-12-2020

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

Vasant Sakharam Dasgaonkar

Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

02-05-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 98/2020 Court decision: The court partially allowed the land acquisition reference, granting enhanced compensation of Rs.700/- per sq. meter (instead of the applicant's claimed Rs.1,000/-) for 1,475 sq. meters of agricultural land acquired in village Bhomjai for the Nageshwari Dam project. The court found the original Special Land Acquisition Officer's compensation inadequate as it relied on outdated revenue-based classification rather than actual market value, and awarded statutory benefits including 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 98/2020 Court decision: The court partially allowed the land acquisition reference, granting enhanced compensation of Rs.700/- per sq. meter (instead of the applicant's claimed Rs.1,000/-) for 1,475 sq. meters of agricultural land acquired in village Bhomjai for the Nageshwari Dam project. The court found the original Special Land Acquisition Officer's compensation inadequate as it relied on outdated revenue-based classification rather than actual market value, and awarded statutory benefits including 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case