Kisan Janu Bhojane and ors vs M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors — 93/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007752023

Filing Number

93/2020

Filing Date

10-Dec-2020

Registration No

93/2020

Registration Date

10-Dec-2020

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 28-A(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kisan Janu Bhojane and ors

    Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s. S.D.O. Land Acquisition Mahad Division and ors

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Kisan Janu Bhojane v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. 93/2020) The Mahad Civil Court partly allowed the reference for enhanced compensation on land acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, finding the original award inadequate. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter (instead of the lower original rate), holding that the Land Acquisition Officer failed to properly consider relevant factors like proximity to industries, railways, and development potential when determining market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 14-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 24-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 27-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 06-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 07-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 02-May-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 21-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 10-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kisan Janu Bhojane v. S.D.O. Land Acquisition (L.A.R. 93/2020) The Mahad Civil Court partly allowed the reference for enhanced compensation on land acquired for the Nageshwari Dam project, finding the original award inadequate. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs. 700/- per sq. meter (instead of the lower original rate), holding that the Land Acquisition Officer failed to properly consider relevant factors like proximity to industries, railways, and development potential when determining market value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case