Bhiku Sonu Kijbile. vs Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P. — 26/2006

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007452023

Filing Number

26/2006

Filing Date

22-Jun-2006

Registration No

26/2006

Registration Date

29-Jun-2006

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhiku Sonu Kijbile.

    Adv. B.T.Navale.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: L.A.R. No.26/2006 Court Decision: The court partly allowed the reference, awarding enhanced land compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter (instead of the original lower rate) for 1,200 sq.meters acquired in Bijghar village for the Nageshwari Dam project, plus statutory 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9-15% p.a. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award was found inadequate because it wrongly based valuation on outdated land revenue assessment rather than actual market value. The court applied comparable nearby sale transactions and accounting for development costs, determined fair market value at Rs.700/- per sq.meter at the 1999 notification date, citing parity with prior similar cases on the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  33. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  34. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  35. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  36. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  37. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  38. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  39. 26-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  40. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  41. 01-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  42. 13-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  43. 25-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  44. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  45. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  46. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  47. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  48. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  49. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  50. 22-Dec-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  51. 22-Dec-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  52. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  53. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  54. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  55. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  56. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  57. 21-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 22-Jun-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.R. No.26/2006 Court Decision: The court partly allowed the reference, awarding enhanced land compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter (instead of the original lower rate) for 1,200 sq.meters acquired in Bijghar village for the Nageshwari Dam project, plus statutory 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9-15% p.a. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award was found inadequate because it wrongly based valuation on outdated land revenue assessment rather than actual market value. The court applied comparable nearby sale transactions and accounting for development costs, determined fair market value at Rs.700/- per sq.meter at the 1999 notification date, citing parity with prior similar cases on the same project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case