Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar @ Desai vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 79/2020
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190007332023
Filing Number
79/2020
Filing Date
17-09-2020
Registration No
79/2020
Registration Date
04-12-2020
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar @ Desai
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad
May. Collector, Raigad
May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar v. Special Land Acquisition Officer Court Decision: The reference was partly allowed. The applicant succeeded in proving the original compensation was inadequate; he was awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of his claim for Rs.1,000/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component) and interest. Key Reasoning: The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation method—grouping lands by revenue assessment and relying solely on the Ready Reckoner—violated settled law. The applicant's evidence of comparable sales deeds showing higher rates, proximity to M.I.D.C., railway station, and N.A. potential justified enhancement, though a 65% deduction for development costs was applied to differentiate undeveloped agricultural land from developed city property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar v. Special Land Acquisition Officer Court Decision: The reference was partly allowed. The applicant succeeded in proving the original compensation was inadequate; he was awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of his claim for Rs.1,000/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component) and interest. Key Reasoning: The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation method—grouping lands by revenue assessment and relying solely on the Ready Reckoner—violated settled law. The applicant's evidence of comparable sales deeds showing higher rates, proximity to M.I.D.C., railway station, and N.A. potential justified enhancement, though a 65% deduction for development costs was applied to differentiate undeveloped agricultural land from developed city property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts