Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar @ Desai vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 79/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007332023

Case disposed

Filing Number

79/2020

Filing Date

17-09-2020

Registration No

79/2020

Registration Date

04-12-2020

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar @ Desai

Adv. Navale B. T.

Respondent(s)

May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad

May. Collector, Raigad

May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

02-05-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar v. Special Land Acquisition Officer Court Decision: The reference was partly allowed. The applicant succeeded in proving the original compensation was inadequate; he was awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of his claim for Rs.1,000/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component) and interest. Key Reasoning: The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation method—grouping lands by revenue assessment and relying solely on the Ready Reckoner—violated settled law. The applicant's evidence of comparable sales deeds showing higher rates, proximity to M.I.D.C., railway station, and N.A. potential justified enhancement, though a 65% deduction for development costs was applied to differentiate undeveloped agricultural land from developed city property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Pandurang Chandu Dasgaonkar v. Special Land Acquisition Officer Court Decision: The reference was partly allowed. The applicant succeeded in proving the original compensation was inadequate; he was awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700/- per sq.meter instead of his claim for Rs.1,000/- per sq.meter, plus statutory benefits (30% solatium, 12% additional component) and interest. Key Reasoning: The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's valuation method—grouping lands by revenue assessment and relying solely on the Ready Reckoner—violated settled law. The applicant's evidence of comparable sales deeds showing higher rates, proximity to M.I.D.C., railway station, and N.A. potential justified enhancement, though a 65% deduction for development costs was applied to differentiate undeveloped agricultural land from developed city property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case