Shantaram Dharma Mahadik and ors vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 78/2020
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190007312023
Filing Number
78/2020
Filing Date
17-09-2020
Registration No
78/2020
Registration Date
04-12-2020
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shantaram Dharma Mahadik and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad
May. Collector, Raigad
May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Shantaram Dharma Mahadik v. Collector, Raigad (LAR 78/2020) The Civil Judge of Mahad partly allowed the reference for land compensation enhancement. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award of Rs.97,500-68,500 per hectare was inadequate because it failed to consider relevant market factors, relied solely on outdated revenue-based land classification, and ignored comparable sale transactions. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per square meter (after deducting 65% development costs from sale evidence), with 30% solatium and 12% additional component plus interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Shantaram Dharma Mahadik v. Collector, Raigad (LAR 78/2020) The Civil Judge of Mahad partly allowed the reference for land compensation enhancement. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award of Rs.97,500-68,500 per hectare was inadequate because it failed to consider relevant market factors, relied solely on outdated revenue-based land classification, and ignored comparable sale transactions. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per square meter (after deducting 65% development costs from sale evidence), with 30% solatium and 12% additional component plus interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts