Shantaram Dharma Mahadik and ors vs May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad — 78/2020
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190007312023
Filing Number
78/2020
Filing Date
17-Sep-2020
Registration No
78/2020
Registration Date
04-Dec-2020
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantaram Dharma Mahadik and ors
Adv. Navale B. T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.May Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) Sub Division Officer, Mahad
-
2.May. Collector, Raigad
-
3.May. Executive Engineering, Hetwane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Shantaram Dharma Mahadik v. Collector, Raigad (LAR 78/2020) The Civil Judge of Mahad partly allowed the reference for land compensation enhancement. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award of Rs.97,500-68,500 per hectare was inadequate because it failed to consider relevant market factors, relied solely on outdated revenue-based land classification, and ignored comparable sale transactions. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per square meter (after deducting 65% development costs from sale evidence), with 30% solatium and 12% additional component plus interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
01-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
16-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
19-Jun-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Apr-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
03-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
06-Feb-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
19-Dec-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
24-Oct-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
08-Aug-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
02-May-2024
—
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
28-Mar-2024
—
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
21-Dec-2023
—
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
-
12-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2020
Summary of Shantaram Dharma Mahadik v. Collector, Raigad (LAR 78/2020) The Civil Judge of Mahad partly allowed the reference for land compensation enhancement. The court found the Special Land Acquisition Officer's original award of Rs.97,500-68,500 per hectare was inadequate because it failed to consider relevant market factors, relied solely on outdated revenue-based land classification, and ignored comparable sale transactions. The court awarded enhanced compensation at Rs.700 per square meter (after deducting 65% development costs from sale evidence), with 30% solatium and 12% additional component plus interest at 9-15% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts