Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors. vs Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P. — 17/2006

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007232023

Case disposed

Filing Number

17/2006

Filing Date

05-06-2006

Registration No

17/2006

Registration Date

26-06-2006

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Petitioner(s)

Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors.

Adv. B.T.Navale.

Respondent(s)

Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

02-05-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case