Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors. vs Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P. — 17/2006
Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHRG190007232023
Filing Number
17/2006
Filing Date
05-06-2006
Registration No
17/2006
Registration Date
26-06-2006
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Petitioner(s)
Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors.
Adv. B.T.Navale.
Respondent(s)
Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts