Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors. vs Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P. — 17/2006

Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHRG190007232023

Filing Number

17/2006

Filing Date

05-Jun-2006

Registration No

17/2006

Registration Date

26-Jun-2006

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Dhondu Pawar 3 ors.

    Adv. B.T.Navale.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Spl.Land.Acq.Officer Raigad-Alibag 1 Advocate - D.G.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 13-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  21. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  23. 12-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  24. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  25. 10-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  28. 14-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  29. 26-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  30. 08-Aug-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  31. 27-Jun-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  32. 13-Jun-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  33. 25-Apr-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  34. 04-Apr-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  35. 03-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  36. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  38. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  39. 08-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  40. 25-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  41. 11-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  42. 04-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  43. 14-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  44. 07-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  45. 23-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  46. 26-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  47. 19-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  48. 05-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  49. 14-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 05-Jun-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 17/2006 Court Decision: The Court partly allowed the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhancing compensation for applicants' acquired agricultural land from Rs.700/- per sq. meter, plus 30% solatium, 12% additional component, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) per annum. Key Reasoning: The Special Land Acquisition Officer's methodology of classifying land based on outdated revenue assessment was flawed and failed to consider critical factors including proximity to M.I.D.C. Mahad, railway station, highways, non-agricultural potential, tourism significance, and comparable market transactions showing rates of Rs.1,097-2,119/sq. meter. Precedent judgments from the same village awarded identical compensation, supporting parity entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case