Anant Gangaram More vs Maharashtra Government tarfe Executive Engg of PWD — 34/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Ready Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG190002432025

e-Filing Number

09-07-2025

Filing Number

251/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anant Gangaram More

    Adv. KALE SANTOSH SHANKAR

  2. 2.Shyam Narayan More

    Adv. KALE SANTOSH SHANKAR

  3. 3.Ravindra Narayan More

    Adv. KALE SANTOSH SHANKAR

  4. 4.Vinayak Gangaram More

    Adv. KALE SANTOSH SHANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Government tarfe Executive Engg of PWD

  2. 2.Upvibhagiya Abhiyanta sarvjanik bandhkam vibhag Poladpur

  3. 3.S A Sheth prop Sanjay Anil Sheth

    Adv. Bhate A. C.

  4. 4.Manoj Jayant Bhagvat Thekedar

  5. 5.Suresh Yashwant More

  6. 6.Babibai Yashwant More

  7. 7.Baya Bhosale

  8. 8.Sudhbai Balaram Surve

  9. 9.Savita Waman More

  10. 10.Sharmila Prakash More

  11. 11.Sundar Narayan More

  12. 12.Kusum Shivaji Vichare

  13. 13.Shobha Sambhaji Palande

  14. 14.Jaywant Gangajirao More

  15. 15.Eknath Mahadev More

  16. 16.Mahesh Mahadev More

  17. 17.Kunda Ajit Yerunkar

  18. 18.Nanda Avinash Chalke

  19. 19.Sachin Shivaji More

  20. 20.Nilima Sunil Bhosale

  21. 21.Suman Shridhar Mahadik

  22. 22.Priti Praful Bhosale

  23. 23.Shivaji Yashwant Darekar urf More

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 34/2025 Outcome: The petition filed by Anant Gangaram More and others was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request to impose an injunction restraining respondents (Maharashtra Government PWD officials and contractors) from undertaking any construction work at the disputed location and maintaining the status quo. Court costs were directed to be included in the case decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  12. 13-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  17. 01-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  18. 28-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 34/2025 Outcome: The petition filed by Anant Gangaram More and others was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's request to impose an injunction restraining respondents (Maharashtra Government PWD officials and contractors) from undertaking any construction work at the disputed location and maintaining the status quo. Court costs were directed to be included in the case decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case