Maruti Ganpat Kadam vs Pankaj Baliram Dayate, Etc., Advocate - Gandhi R. R. — 48/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHRG190001192023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2023
Filing Date
26-08-2023
Registration No
48/2023
Registration Date
26-08-2023
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maruti Ganpat Kadam
Adv. Mehta S. S.
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Baliram Dayate, Etc., Advocate - Gandhi R. R.
Nilesh Kondiram Dayate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The petition for correction of a typographical error in the suit was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to correct the defendant's name in the original case document (Civil Suit No. 48/2023, previously No. 135/2018) by the next date of hearing, finding the correction to be minor in nature and cause no prejudice to the defendant. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition for correction of a typographical error in the suit was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to correct the defendant's name in the original case document (Civil Suit No. 48/2023, previously No. 135/2018) by the next date of hearing, finding the correction to be minor in nature and cause no prejudice to the defendant. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts