Santosh Abaji Kadam vs Pankaj Baliram Dayate, Etc., Advocate - Gandhi R. R. — 47/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHRG190001152023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
26-08-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
26-08-2023
Court
Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Abaji Kadam
Adv. Mehta S. S.
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Baliram Dayate, Etc., Advocate - Gandhi R. R.
Nilesh Kondiram Dayate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 24-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition to correct a typographical error in the defendant's name (from "Pankesh Balirm Dayate" to "Pankaj Balirm Dayate") under CPC Order 6, Rule 17 is allowed. The court found the proposed correction to be minor and permissible, noting it will not prejudice the defendant and will prevent future complications. The plaintiff is directed to file the corrected plaint within the next hearing date, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition to correct a typographical error in the defendant's name (from "Pankesh Balirm Dayate" to "Pankaj Balirm Dayate") under CPC Order 6, Rule 17 is allowed. The court found the proposed correction to be minor and permissible, noting it will not prejudice the defendant and will prevent future complications. The plaintiff is directed to file the corrected plaint within the next hearing date, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts