Shripat Dhondu Katkar Death Thr LRs Bhagvan Shripat Shinde Aka Katkar vs Sub Div. Officer Mahad Div. Tal. Mahad Raigad Collector Alibag — 8/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHRG190000182025

Amended Plaint

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-01-2025

Filing Number

19/2025

Filing Date

28-01-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

28-01-2025

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Shripat Dhondu Katkar Death Thr LRs Bhagvan Shripat Shinde Aka Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Shripat Dhondu Katkar Dead Thr LRs Aadinath Shripat Shinde Aka Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Shripat Dhondu Katkar Dead LRs Anant Shripat Shinde Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Shripat Dhondu Katkar Dead LRs Sushama Dinesh Aarav

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Shripat Dhondu Katkar Dead LRs Sarswati Shripat Shinde Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Vitthal Dhondu Shinde Aka Katkar Dead LRs Shalini Vitthal Shinde Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Vitthal Dhondu Shinde Aka Katkar Dead LRs Sandip Vitthal Shinde Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Vitthal Dhondu Shinde Aka Katkar Death Legal Heirs Samir Vitthal Shinde Aka Katkar

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Vitthal Dhondu Shinde Aka Katkar Death Legal Heirs Sangita Sunil Davande

Adv. THALE RACHANA KAMALAKAR

Respondent(s)

Sub Div. Officer Mahad Div. Tal. Mahad Raigad Collector Alibag

May Executive Engineer Hetwane Canal Division

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

04-05-2026

Amended Plaint

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

05-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

05-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

29-01-2026

Order

Interim Orders

04-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 8/2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court permitted the petitioners to file an amended petition with additional clauses within the specified timeframe. The petitioners sought to modify Section 13 of the original petition by adding a new subsection to allow monthly or quarterly disbursement of bank interest accrued on a fixed deposit, rather than a lump-sum payment. The court found the proposed amendment legally permissible and did not prejudice the respondent's position in any pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court permitted the petitioners to file an amended petition with additional clauses within the specified timeframe. The petitioners sought to modify Section 13 of the original petition by adding a new subsection to allow monthly or quarterly disbursement of bank interest accrued on a fixed deposit, rather than a lump-sum payment. The court found the proposed amendment legally permissible and did not prejudice the respondent's position in any pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case