The state of Maharashtra vs Pandurang Maruti Pavashe and Ors. — 508/2019
Case under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act Section 3,4. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
MAHA P.I.D. 1999. - Special Case under Mah. P.I.D. Act
CNR: MHRG170130962019
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
508/2019
Filing Date
05-11-2019
Registration No
508/2019
Registration Date
05-11-2019
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
303
Police Station
Kharghar Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The state of Maharashtra
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Maruti Pavashe and Ors.
Vaibhav Ramakant Girdhar
Ramesh Krishna Keni.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 09-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 27-01-2026 | Charge | |
| 20-12-2025 | Charge | |
| 07-11-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of four accused persons (Pandurang Maruti Pawshe, Manoj Ramesh Bhoir, Satyavan Krishna Keni, and Vaibhav Ramakant Girdhar) charged with fraud under IPC sections 406, 420, 409, 120(B) and MPID Act sections 3-4 for operating an illegal investment scheme called "Bijankur" has been rejected. The court found that the accused's claim of seized property worth Rs.8-15 crores was unsupported by documentary evidence, and the court noted that successive bail applications on the same grounds are not maintainable after prior rejection by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of four accused persons (Pandurang Maruti Pawshe, Manoj Ramesh Bhoir, Satyavan Krishna Keni, and Vaibhav Ramakant Girdhar) charged with fraud under IPC sections 406, 420, 409, 120(B) and MPID Act sections 3-4 for operating an illegal investment scheme called "Bijankur" has been rejected. The court found that the accused's claim of seized property worth Rs.8-15 crores was unsupported by documentary evidence, and the court noted that successive bail applications on the same grounds are not maintainable after prior rejection by the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts