The state of maharashtra vs Shyam Mahadeo Gharat ors — 556/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

MAHA P.I.D. 1999. - Special Case under Mah. P.I.D. Act

CNR: MHRG170130862019

Charge

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

556/2019

Filing Date

20-03-2006

Registration No

556/2019

Registration Date

21-12-2019

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

Panvel CityTown Police Station

Year

2004

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,406,34
Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

The state of maharashtra

Adv. Government pleader

Respondent(s)

Shyam Mahadeo Gharat ors

Sindhu Revaram Bagade

Bhushan Anant Gharve

Nandkumar Balu Bhoir

Punjaji Sitaram Laate

Ashok Kishor Das

Aslam Mahammad Khan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

27-04-2026

Charge

20-04-2026

Charge

10-03-2026

Charge

12-02-2026

Charge

09-01-2026

Charge

Interim Orders

11-04-2023
Order on Exhibit

Bail Denied Accused Sindhu Rajaram Bagade's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected. The court found her involvement in 23 economic offences involving misappropriation of Rs. 11,17,11,891, her 18-year abscondence as a chargesheeted accused, and her role as director of the financial company rendered her ineligible for bail despite claiming to be a nominal, non-active director. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Denied Accused Sindhu Rajaram Bagade's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected. The court found her involvement in 23 economic offences involving misappropriation of Rs. 11,17,11,891, her 18-year abscondence as a chargesheeted accused, and her role as director of the financial company rendered her ineligible for bail despite claiming to be a nominal, non-active director. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case