The state of Maharashtra vs Prakash Baburao Govalkar and Ors. — 557/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120,201. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
MAHA P.I.D. 1999. - Special Case under Mah. P.I.D. Act
CNR: MHRG170130602019
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
557/2019
Filing Date
25-06-2007
Registration No
557/2019
Registration Date
21-12-2019
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Rasayani Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The state of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Prakash Baburao Govalkar and Ors.
Yashwant Ramchandra Jadhav
Unmesh @Umesh Manohar Chaudhari
Bhushan Anant Gharve
Ashok Kishor Das
Aslam Mahammad Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 20-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 10-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 12-02-2026 | Charge | |
| 09-01-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED Sunita Narayan Lonare's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel on 11/04/2023. The accused faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B) and Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act for financial crimes involving misappropriation of Rs.11,17,11,891 across 23 registered cases. The court found no justification for bail considering the nature and gravity of the offences, multiple pending crimes against the accused, and her prior abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED Sunita Narayan Lonare's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel on 11/04/2023. The accused faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B) and Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act for financial crimes involving misappropriation of Rs.11,17,11,891 across 23 registered cases. The court found no justification for bail considering the nature and gravity of the offences, multiple pending crimes against the accused, and her prior abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts