State of Maharashtra vs Arif Jakir Shekh And — 207/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(c),29. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170024672024
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1670/2024
Filing Date
06-12-2024
Registration No
207/2024
Registration Date
06-12-2024
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arif Jakir Shekh And
Parvej Babu Ali Shekh
Hanoj Hoshi Engineer
Diva Dasharath Umbare
Pankaj Ananta Mohite
Akash Uttamrav Chavhan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Application Allowed - The court granted interim custody of the seized Innova vehicle (Reg. No. MH43/AJ-1350) to applicant Pankaj Anand Mohite, following Supreme Court precedent that vehicles should not remain at police stations during lengthy investigations. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,00,000 and deposit a bank guarantee of Rs. 4,00,000 with the investigation officer, and is prohibited from using the vehicle for similar crimes under penalty of confiscation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Application Allowed - The court granted interim custody of the seized Innova vehicle (Reg. No. MH43/AJ-1350) to applicant Pankaj Anand Mohite, following Supreme Court precedent that vehicles should not remain at police stations during lengthy investigations. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,00,000 and deposit a bank guarantee of Rs. 4,00,000 with the investigation officer, and is prohibited from using the vehicle for similar crimes under penalty of confiscation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts