BALASAHEB RATAN BAGUL And 01 vs The State Of Maharashtra — 104/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Notice_Unready Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHRG170022352024

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

1513/2024

Filing Date

21-Oct-2024

Registration No

104/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

6-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALASAHEB RATAN BAGUL And 01

    Adv. BABRE KALPANA NARENDRA

  2. 2.Saptashrungi Investment And financial Services Through it's Proprietor BALASAHEB RATAN BAGUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  9. 11-Aug-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  10. 07-Jul-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  11. 02-Jul-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  12. 22-May-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  13. 24-Apr-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

  14. 15-Mar-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  15. 24-Jan-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  16. 26-Dec-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Criminal Revision Application filed by Balasaheb Ratan Bagul seeking stay of Criminal Case No. 432/2022 (involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust related to share market investments of ₹27 lakhs) has been rejected. The court found insufficient grounds for granting stay, noting that the Magistrate's earlier rejection of the discharge application was justified due to strong prima facie evidence against the applicant, and that the applicant failed to specifically demonstrate irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 26-Dec-2024

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  18. 18-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  19. 09-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  20. 05-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  21. 14-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel

  22. 08-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 21-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Criminal Revision Application filed by Balasaheb Ratan Bagul seeking stay of Criminal Case No. 432/2022 (involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust related to share market investments of ₹27 lakhs) has been rejected. The court found insufficient grounds for granting stay, noting that the Magistrate's earlier rejection of the discharge application was justified due to strong prima facie evidence against the applicant, and that the applicant failed to specifically demonstrate irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case