State of Maharashtra Through Khalapur Police Station vs Vivek Vishwanath Gayakwad and — 262/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),20(B)(ii),29. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHRG170022142025

Charge

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1666/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

262/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

FIR Details

FIR Number

340

Police Station

Khalapur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 8(C),20(B)(ii),29

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Khalapur Police Station

Adv. Government pleader

Respondent(s)

Vivek Vishwanath Gayakwad and

Sudarshan Vasant Sawant

Pradip Satyawan Waghamare

Kalpbata Alias Tulu Prafull Raut

Suman Pramodkumar Bastiyar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel

07-04-2026

Charge

25-03-2026

Charge

20-03-2026

Charge

16-03-2026

Charge

09-03-2026

Charge

Interim Orders

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Order Summary: The Court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Suzuki Access scooter (Reg. No. MH06/DB-2454) to applicant Sudarshan Vasant Sawant. The State had no objection to the release. The applicant must furnish a Rs. 50,000 supurdnama bond, cannot sell/transfer/modify the scooter, and must produce it for trial as directed by the Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Order Summary: The Court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Suzuki Access scooter (Reg. No. MH06/DB-2454) to applicant Sudarshan Vasant Sawant. The State had no objection to the release. The applicant must furnish a Rs. 50,000 supurdnama bond, cannot sell/transfer/modify the scooter, and must produce it for trial as directed by the Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case