State of Maharashtra vs Prashant Yashwant Kothavale and — 158/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,336,338,160,147,148,149,504,506,186,188,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170019522022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1440/2022
Filing Date
04-10-2022
Registration No
158/2022
Registration Date
04-10-2022
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
Khopoli Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Prashant Yashwant Kothavale and
Prathmesh Yashwant Kothavale
Pratik Yashwant Kothavale
Yashwant Bansi Kothavale
Yogesh Digambar Jamdar
Abu Bakar Adam Jalgaonkar
Mahammad Naim Mukari
Nijam Amad Jalgaonkar
Bebi Unnani Samual
Jimi Abin Samual
Robin Bebi Samual
Sumin Bebi Samual
Mainuddin Kasim Shaikh
Suben Bebi Samual
Chetan Chandrakant Sherkar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 21-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by accused Ebin Baby Samuel for permission to renew his passport has been allowed. The court granted permission for passport renewal as per rules, recognizing the fundamental right to travel under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. However, the accused is restricted from traveling abroad without prior court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by accused Ebin Baby Samuel for permission to renew his passport has been allowed. The court granted permission for passport renewal as per rules, recognizing the fundamental right to travel under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. However, the accused is restricted from traveling abroad without prior court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts