State of Maharashtra Through Neral Police Station vs Sachin Rammilan Jaiswar and — 225/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),30,29,27(A),25. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170018872025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
1409/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
225/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
137
Police Station
Neral Police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Neral Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Sachin Rammilan Jaiswar and
Javed Ahmed Sheikh
Mohammad Jafar Mohammad Ali
Amit Ashokkumar Kori
Bharat Siddheshwar Jadhav
Laxman Jaitu alias Devram Fasal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Charge |
| 21-05-2026 | Charge |
| 14-05-2026 | Charge |
| 08-05-2026 | Charge |
| 02-05-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court allowed applicant Sachin Rammilan Jaiswar's application for interim custody of his Samsung Galaxy Fold 6 mobile phone seized by Neral Police Station in a narcotics case. The court granted custody subject to conditions: furnishing a Rs. 1,00,000 bond, producing the phone at trial as required, not tampering with or transferring the device, and maintaining colored photographs of it. The order is voidable if the phone is used in criminal activities or its contents are tampered with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court allowed applicant Sachin Rammilan Jaiswar's application for interim custody of his Samsung Galaxy Fold 6 mobile phone seized by Neral Police Station in a narcotics case. The court granted custody subject to conditions: furnishing a Rs. 1,00,000 bond, producing the phone at trial as required, not tampering with or transferring the device, and maintaining colored photographs of it. The order is voidable if the phone is used in criminal activities or its contents are tampered with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts