Rajendra Madhukar Joshi Owner Of Chaitanya Builders And Developers vs Shanubai Vasant Vaskar and — 6/2023

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 10. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Commercial Suit

CNR: MHRG170018172023

Notice Ready

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-09-2023

Filing Number

998/2023

Filing Date

11-09-2023

Registration No

6/2023

Registration Date

11-09-2023

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

Rajendra Madhukar Joshi Owner Of Chaitanya Builders And Developers

Adv. S.M. Lad

Respondent(s)

Shanubai Vasant Vaskar and

Anusaya Shankar Patil

Mahadev Shantaram Mhatre

Bharat Shantaram Mhatre

Sangeet Namdev Mhatre

Sunny Namdev Mhatre

Rasana Ganesh Mhatre

City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd Through Its Managing Director

Chief Land And Survey Officer City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd

The Estate Officer City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd

Town Planning Officer, City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

16-04-2026

Notice Ready

12-03-2026

Hearing

22-01-2026

Hearing

18-12-2025

Hearing

07-11-2025

Compliance

Interim Orders

15-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 06/2023 Outcome: Plaint returned; case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Judge held that the suit for specific performance of an agreement to lease agricultural land is cognizable by civil courts, not commercial courts. Though the transaction involves a builder-developer purchasing leasehold rights from farmers with intent for eventual commercial development, the court found the dispute itself concerns agricultural land conversion and property transfer—not a commercial transaction within Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act. The plaint was returned to the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation to the appropriate civil court, with proceedings listed for compliance on 25.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 06/2023 Outcome: Plaint returned; case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Judge held that the suit for specific performance of an agreement to lease agricultural land is cognizable by civil courts, not commercial courts. Though the transaction involves a builder-developer purchasing leasehold rights from farmers with intent for eventual commercial development, the court found the dispute itself concerns agricultural land conversion and property transfer—not a commercial transaction within Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act. The plaint was returned to the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation to the appropriate civil court, with proceedings listed for compliance on 25.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case