Rajendra Madhukar Joshi Owner Of Chaitanya Builders And Developers vs Shanubai Vasant Vaskar and — 6/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 10. Status: Notice Ready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Commercial Suit
CNR: MHRG170018172023
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-09-2023
Filing Number
998/2023
Filing Date
11-09-2023
Registration No
6/2023
Registration Date
11-09-2023
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Madhukar Joshi Owner Of Chaitanya Builders And Developers
Adv. S.M. Lad
Respondent(s)
Shanubai Vasant Vaskar and
Anusaya Shankar Patil
Mahadev Shantaram Mhatre
Bharat Shantaram Mhatre
Sangeet Namdev Mhatre
Sunny Namdev Mhatre
Rasana Ganesh Mhatre
City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd Through Its Managing Director
Chief Land And Survey Officer City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd
The Estate Officer City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd
Town Planning Officer, City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Notice Ready
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Notice Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 22-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 07-11-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 06/2023 Outcome: Plaint returned; case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Judge held that the suit for specific performance of an agreement to lease agricultural land is cognizable by civil courts, not commercial courts. Though the transaction involves a builder-developer purchasing leasehold rights from farmers with intent for eventual commercial development, the court found the dispute itself concerns agricultural land conversion and property transfer—not a commercial transaction within Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act. The plaint was returned to the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation to the appropriate civil court, with proceedings listed for compliance on 25.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 06/2023 Outcome: Plaint returned; case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The District Judge held that the suit for specific performance of an agreement to lease agricultural land is cognizable by civil courts, not commercial courts. Though the transaction involves a builder-developer purchasing leasehold rights from farmers with intent for eventual commercial development, the court found the dispute itself concerns agricultural land conversion and property transfer—not a commercial transaction within Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Commercial Courts Act. The plaint was returned to the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation to the appropriate civil court, with proceedings listed for compliance on 25.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts