State of Maharashtra vs Dinesh Tejraj Solanki And — 141/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,34,465,467,468,471,12(B). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170016882024
Filing Number
1121/2024
Filing Date
13-Aug-2024
Registration No
141/2024
Registration Date
13-Aug-2024
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
280
Police Station
Karjat Police StationTal.Karjat
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dinesh Tejraj Solanki And
-
2.Deepak Sakharam Jagtap
Case History
-
13-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
19-Jan-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
09-Dec-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
03-Nov-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
03-Oct-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
09-Sep-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
18-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
29-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
08-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
-
09-May-2025
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Feb-2025
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
14-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary Bail was granted to accused Dinesh Tejraj Solanki in a financial misappropriation case involving Rs. 1.94 crore. The court found that the investigating officer grossly violated Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code by orally informing the accused of arrest grounds instead of providing written communication, violating constitutional rights under Article 22(5). The accused was released on bail bonds of Rs. 30,000 with conditions including furnishing address proof, attending police station when called, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jan-2025
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
09-Jan-2025
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
02-Jan-2025
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
26-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
23-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
19-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
05-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
02-Dec-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
19-Nov-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
07-Nov-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
06-Nov-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
23-Oct-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
16-Oct-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
11-Oct-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
27-Sep-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
26-Sep-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
19-Sep-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
09-Sep-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
04-Sep-2024
Production of Accused
District and Addl.Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
20-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 141/2024
Summary Bail was granted to accused Dinesh Tejraj Solanki in a financial misappropriation case involving Rs. 1.94 crore. The court found that the investigating officer grossly violated Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code by orally informing the accused of arrest grounds instead of providing written communication, violating constitutional rights under Article 22(5). The accused was released on bail bonds of Rs. 30,000 with conditions including furnishing address proof, attending police station when called, and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts