State of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Dayaram Gondhali — 134/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,354,511. Status: First Order. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170016392024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1098/2024
Filing Date
07-08-2024
Registration No
134/2024
Registration Date
07-08-2024
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
Uran Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Dayaram Gondhali
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
First Order
First Order
First Order
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | First Order | |
| 18-12-2025 | First Order | |
| 17-10-2025 | First Order | |
| 08-09-2025 | First Order | |
| 05-07-2025 | First Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special Judge at Panvel allowed the accused Rajendra Dayaram Gondhali's application for release of his seized Maruti Swift vehicle (Reg. No. MH-46-W-6248) used in crime No. 267/2024 involving offences under IPC sections 363, 354, 311 and POCSO Act 2012. The vehicle will be returned to the accused subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 3,00,000 indemnity bond, obtaining valid insurance, preparing a panchanama with photographs, producing the vehicle in court when required, and prohibiting any modifications or sale without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Judge at Panvel allowed the accused Rajendra Dayaram Gondhali's application for release of his seized Maruti Swift vehicle (Reg. No. MH-46-W-6248) used in crime No. 267/2024 involving offences under IPC sections 363, 354, 311 and POCSO Act 2012. The vehicle will be returned to the accused subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 3,00,000 indemnity bond, obtaining valid insurance, preparing a panchanama with photographs, producing the vehicle in court when required, and prohibiting any modifications or sale without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts