MAHIPAL SINGH And 1 vs The State of Maharashtra through Khandeshwar Police Station — 51/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th April 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHRG170014082025
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
1062/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
23-07-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHIPAL SINGH And 1
Adv. Sunil Rathod
RAMBABU KHARVA
Adv. Sunil Rathod
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Khandeshwar Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 23-02-2026 | Citation | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petitions filed by three accused persons (a labour contractor, site supervisor, and site engineer) challenging the magistrate's order rejecting their discharge applications. The court found prima facie evidence of rash and negligent conduct under Section 304-A IPC in the electrocution death of a worker who was forced to enter a water-logged pit and touch a live electric motor without proper safety measures. The court upheld the order to frame charges and proceed with trial, rejecting the accused's arguments that insufficient evidence existed for culpable negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petitions filed by three accused persons (a labour contractor, site supervisor, and site engineer) challenging the magistrate's order rejecting their discharge applications. The court found prima facie evidence of rash and negligent conduct under Section 304-A IPC in the electrocution death of a worker who was forced to enter a water-logged pit and touch a live electric motor without proper safety measures. The court upheld the order to frame charges and proceed with trial, rejecting the accused's arguments that insufficient evidence existed for culpable negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts