NIKITA RAI D/o SESHNATH RAI vs The state of Maharashtra through Khandeshwar Police station — 50/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th April 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHRG170014072025
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
1061/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
23-07-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIKITA RAI D/o SESHNATH RAI
Adv. GOPALE MONIKA SHEKHAR
Respondent(s)
The state of Maharashtra through Khandeshwar Police station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 23-02-2026 | Citation | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed both criminal revision petitions challenging the magistrate's rejection of discharge applications filed by three accused persons (labour contractor, site supervisor, and site engineer) charged under Section 304-A IPC for causing death by negligence. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused's rash and negligent conduct—including forcing workers to handle an electric motor in water-logged conditions without proper safety measures—directly caused the electrocution death of a laborer, establishing sufficient grounds to proceed with trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed both criminal revision petitions challenging the magistrate's rejection of discharge applications filed by three accused persons (labour contractor, site supervisor, and site engineer) charged under Section 304-A IPC for causing death by negligence. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused's rash and negligent conduct—including forcing workers to handle an electric motor in water-logged conditions without proper safety measures—directly caused the electrocution death of a laborer, establishing sufficient grounds to proceed with trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts