State of Maharashtra Through Nhava Sheva Police staiton vs Nzekwesu Augustine and — 166/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(k),21(K),22(k),29. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170013312025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
993/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
166/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Nhava Sheva Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Nhava Sheva Police staiton
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Nzekwesu Augustine and
lowson romanic
Happiness inose
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 23-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 09-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 23-02-2026 | Charge | |
| 10-02-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY Lawson Romanic's bail application under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad on 02/01/2026. The applicant, a foreign national, was arrested during a raid on 13/02/2025 where 118.48 gms of Cocaine and 100.84 gms of Mephadrone (quantities exceeding commercial limits) were recovered from the premises, attracting rigorous NDPS Act section 37 provisions. The court found him not entitled to bail due to the serious nature of the offense and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY Lawson Romanic's bail application under section 483 of BNSS, 2023 was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad on 02/01/2026. The applicant, a foreign national, was arrested during a raid on 13/02/2025 where 118.48 gms of Cocaine and 100.84 gms of Mephadrone (quantities exceeding commercial limits) were recovered from the premises, attracting rigorous NDPS Act section 37 provisions. The court found him not entitled to bail due to the serious nature of the offense and risk of absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts