State of Maharashtra Taloja Police Station vs Kunda dilip Patil and — 156/2025
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170012402025
Filing Number
943/2025
Filing Date
03-Jul-2025
Registration No
156/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
Taloja Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Taloja Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kunda dilip Patil and
-
2.Nilesh Mhatre
-
3.Shubham Bhalchandra Nighukar
-
4.Lata Pandurang Bhoir
-
5.Kacharu Andhalya Thakur
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: Accused No. 3, Shubham Bhalchandra Nighukar, was discharged from crime No. 15/2025 after paying the theft amount and compounding charges. His bail bonds were cancelled and any sureties were discharged from their obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
-
30-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
-
04-Dec-2025
First Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad
-
24-Sep-2025
First Order
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
10-Sep-2025
First Order
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
07-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2025
Summary: Accused No. 3, Shubham Bhalchandra Nighukar, was discharged from crime No. 15/2025 after paying the theft amount and compounding charges. His bail bonds were cancelled and any sureties were discharged from their obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts