State of Maharashtra vs Minali Raj Pande — 92/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,120(B),506,504,34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170012132024
Next Hearing
28th July 2026
Filing Number
842/2024
Filing Date
21-06-2024
Registration No
92/2024
Registration Date
21-06-2024
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Kharghar Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Minali Raj Pande
Vidya Ramakant Kambale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Charge |
| 08-05-2026 | Charge |
| 23-04-2026 | Charge |
| 06-04-2026 | Charge |
| 12-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Minali Raj Pande and Vidya Ramakant Kambale (92/2024) Bail application by Vidya Ramakant Kamble for alleged involvement in a flat-rental fraud scheme was GRANTED on 11/08/2025. The court ordered her release on personal recognizance bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety of equal amount. The applicant must attend police station as required, appear in court on all hearing dates, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. The court found that primary allegations centered on co-accused Minali Pande (already on bail), evidence was documentary in nature, and the applicant had been in custody since 16/04/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Minali Raj Pande and Vidya Ramakant Kambale (92/2024) Bail application by Vidya Ramakant Kamble for alleged involvement in a flat-rental fraud scheme was GRANTED on 11/08/2025. The court ordered her release on personal recognizance bond of Rs.50,000 with one surety of equal amount. The applicant must attend police station as required, appear in court on all hearing dates, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. The court found that primary allegations centered on co-accused Minali Pande (already on bail), evidence was documentary in nature, and the applicant had been in custody since 16/04/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts