State of Maharashtra Through Kharghar Police Station vs Rojina Habib Mulla And — 93/2025
Case under Passport Act 1950 Section 3(A),6(A). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 17th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170011882025
Filing Number
894/2025
Filing Date
26-06-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
26-06-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED
FIR Details
FIR Number
435
Police Station
Kharghar Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Kharghar Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Rojina Habib Mulla And
Tarasina Sahiful Shekh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and additional sessions Judge Panvel
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 28-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Rojina Habib Mulla & Tarsina Sahiful Shaikh (2025) The Additional Sessions Judge convicted both accused of illegally entering India without valid passports under Rule 6(a) of the Passport (Entry into India) Rules 1950, sentencing each to one year four months imprisonment. The court acquitted them of charges under Section 14-A of the Foreigners Act, finding no evidence they entered through restricted areas. The judge noted the accused's admissions of Bangladeshi nationality and poverty-driven migration while ordering their deportation post-sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Rojina Habib Mulla & Tarsina Sahiful Shaikh (2025) The Additional Sessions Judge convicted both accused of illegally entering India without valid passports under Rule 6(a) of the Passport (Entry into India) Rules 1950, sentencing each to one year four months imprisonment. The court acquitted them of charges under Section 14-A of the Foreigners Act, finding no evidence they entered through restricted areas. The judge noted the accused's admissions of Bangladeshi nationality and poverty-driven migration while ordering their deportation post-sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts