V V F (india) Limited vs Glentech Industries pvt.ltd. — 5/2023

Case under Indian Contract Act Section 73,74,75. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Commercial Suit

CNR: MHRG170010772023

e-Filing Number

29-05-2023

Filing Number

778/2023

Filing Date

05-Jun-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

05-Jun-2023

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Contract Act Section 73,74,75
Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Act Section 6,7
Code of Civil Procedure Section 15,18,26,34
Sale of Goods Act Section 57,61

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V V F (india) Limited

    Adv. MONDE SUNIL RAMCHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Glentech Industries pvt.ltd.

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Issues

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Issues

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  10. 13-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Case 5/2023 - VVF (India) Limited v. Glentech Industries Pvt. Ltd. The defendant's application to reject the plaint on jurisdictional grounds was rejected. The court held that the suit falls within its jurisdiction under Section 20(c) of the CPC because part of the transaction occurred at Taloja (within the court's jurisdiction), despite subsequent correspondence suggesting delivery at Kandla. The court found the suit involves recovery of excess payment plus compensation claims, not merely compensation recovery, thus Section 19 does not apply. Costs awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  14. 09-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  16. 03-May-2025

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  18. 07-Mar-2025

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  19. 15-Feb-2025

    Order

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  20. 01-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  21. 04-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  23. 18-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  24. 17-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  25. 19-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  26. 08-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  27. 11-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  28. 20-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  29. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  31. 29-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  32. 06-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  33. 09-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  34. 28-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  35. 17-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  36. 29-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  37. 18-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  38. 04-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  39. 06-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 05-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 5/2023 - VVF (India) Limited v. Glentech Industries Pvt. Ltd. The defendant's application to reject the plaint on jurisdictional grounds was rejected. The court held that the suit falls within its jurisdiction under Section 20(c) of the CPC because part of the transaction occurred at Taloja (within the court's jurisdiction), despite subsequent correspondence suggesting delivery at Kandla. The court found the suit involves recovery of excess payment plus compensation claims, not merely compensation recovery, thus Section 19 does not apply. Costs awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case