State of Maharashtra Taloja Police Station vs Bharat Sadashiv Jadhav — 131/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,65(2),351(2). Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRG170010332025
Filing Number
761/2025
Filing Date
29-May-2025
Registration No
131/2025
Registration Date
29-May-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
115
Police Station
Taloja Police Station Tal.Panvel
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Taloja Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharat Sadashiv Jadhav
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
07-Apr-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
24-Mar-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
10-Mar-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
24-Feb-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
10-Feb-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
27-Jan-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Jan-2026
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
29-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
15-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
06-Dec-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
27-Nov-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
13-Nov-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
31-Oct-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
17-Oct-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
04-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
25-Sep-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
11-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected The Special Judge at Panvel rejected the bail application of Bharat Sadashiv Jadhav, accused of committing penetrative sexual assault on a 12-year-old victim (his niece) through threats on multiple occasions between June 2024 and March 2025. The court found the offense heinous given the accused's position of trust as a close relative and the victim's age, determining there was substantial risk of witness tampering and evidence obstruction, making continued custody necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
28-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
19-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
05-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
24-Jul-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
10-Jul-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
26-Jun-2025
Production of Accused
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
12-Jun-2025
First Order
District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
-
30-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2025
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected The Special Judge at Panvel rejected the bail application of Bharat Sadashiv Jadhav, accused of committing penetrative sexual assault on a 12-year-old victim (his niece) through threats on multiple occasions between June 2024 and March 2025. The court found the offense heinous given the accused's position of trust as a close relative and the victim's age, determining there was substantial risk of witness tampering and evidence obstruction, making continued custody necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts